CD859582
EST Overview
Libraries
Unigenes
This EST is part of the following unigenes:
Analyses
This EST is derived from or has results from the following analyses
Homology
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q702P1_PEA (Vicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 312 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 415
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q702P0_PEA (Vicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 312 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 415
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q43626_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vicK PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VNE1_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VNE0_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 338 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 441
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VND9_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 334 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 437
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VND7_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 1.684e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VNE2_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 202.601 bits (514), Expect = 1.092e-50 Identity = 100/104 (96.15%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLY+AKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQV+RPVKELAFPGSSHE+DRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYKAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVQRPVKELAFPGSSHEIDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q41677_VICNA (Vicilin OS=Vicia narbonensis PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 188.734 bits (478), Expect = 1.631e-46 Identity = 93/119 (78.15%), Postives = 109/119 (91.60%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 498 +E T+ QVQ Y+AKLS GDVFVIPAGHPV+I ASS+L+L+GFGINA+NN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGS+ EVDRLL+NQKQS+FANAQPQQRE GS ET + LSSIL+AF Sbjct: 345 DENTNTQVQNYKAKLSRGDVFVIPAGHPVSIKASSNLDLLGFGINAKNNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIDRPVKELAFPGSAQEVDRLLENQKQSHFANAQPQQRERGSHETRDHLSSILDAF 463
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q84UI0_LENCU (Allergen Len c 1.0102 (Fragment) OS=Lens culinaris PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 185.652 bits (470), Expect = 1.381e-45 Identity = 92/104 (88.46%), Postives = 98/104 (94.23%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETS QVQ YRAKLSPGDVFV+PAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINA+NN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGSS EVDRLL NQKQS+FANAQP Q E Sbjct: 312 EQEEETSTQVQRYRAKLSPGDVFVVPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAKNNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIQRPVKELAFPGSSREVDRLLTNQKQSHFANAQPLQIE 415
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCLA_PEA (Provicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 187.963 bits (476), Expect = 2.171e-47 Identity = 91/121 (75.21%), Postives = 106/121 (87.60%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 ++EEET QVQ Y+AKL+PGDVFVIPAGHPVA+ ASS+LNL+GFGINAENN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ+++ VK+L FPGS+ EVDRLL+NQKQSYFANAQPQQRE S E + L SIL AF Sbjct: 155 QREEETKNQVQSYKAKLTPGDVFVIPAGHPVAVRASSNLNLLGFGINAENNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIQKQVKDLTFPGSAQEVDRLLENQKQSYFANAQPQQRETRSQEIKEHLYSILGAF 275
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCLC_PEA (Vicilin OS=Pisum sativum PE=2 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 186.422 bits (472), Expect = 6.317e-47 Identity = 90/115 (78.26%), Postives = 107/115 (93.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 154 EEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSI 498 EEE +KQVQ Y+AKLS GDVFVIPAGHPVA+ ASS+L+L+GFGINAENN+RNFLAG+EDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGS+ EVDR+L+NQKQS+FA+AQPQQRE GS ET +RLSS+ Sbjct: 345 EEEINKQVQNYKAKLSSGDVFVIPAGHPVAVKASSNLDLLGFGINAENNQRNFLAGDEDNVISQIQRPVKELAFPGSAQEVDRILENQKQSHFADAQPQQRERGSRETRDRLSSV 459
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCL_VICFA (Vicilin OS=Vicia faba PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 179.489 bits (454), Expect = 7.722e-45 Identity = 89/119 (74.79%), Postives = 104/119 (87.39%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 498 EEE KQVQ Y+AKLSPGDV VIPAG+PVAI ASS+LNL+GFGINAENN+R FLAGEEDNVISQ+ +PVKELAFPGS+ EVD LL+NQKQS+FANAQP++RE GS E ++ L SIL +F Sbjct: 345 EEEIRKQVQNYKAKLSPGDVLVIPAGYPVAIKASSNLNLVGFGINAENNQRYFLAGEEDNVISQIHKPVKELAFPGSAQEVDTLLENQKQSHFANAQPRERERGSQEIKDHLYSILGSF 463
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCLB_PEA (Provicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 168.318 bits (425), Expect = 1.780e-41 Identity = 84/85 (98.82%), Postives = 84/85 (98.82%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 250 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDR 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIG GINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDR Sbjct: 326 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGLGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDR 410
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: CVCA_PEA (Convicilin OS=Pisum sativum GN=CVCA PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 168.318 bits (425), Expect = 1.780e-41 Identity = 79/121 (65.29%), Postives = 103/121 (85.12%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 E +E + +VQ Y A+LSPGDV +IPAGHPVAI+ASS+LNL+GFGINA+NN+RNFL+G +DNVISQ+E PVKEL FPGSS EV+RL+KNQKQS+FA+A+P+Q+E S + LSS+L++F Sbjct: 450 EDRKERNNEVQRYEARLSPGDVVIIPAGHPVAISASSNLNLLGFGINAKNNQRNFLSGSDDNVISQIENPVKELTFPGSSQEVNRLIKNQKQSHFASAEPEQKEEESQRKRSPLSSVLDSF 570
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: GLCB_SOYBN (Beta-conglycinin, beta chain OS=Glycine max GN=CG-4 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 150.984 bits (380), Expect = 2.941e-36 Identity = 72/120 (60.00%), Postives = 95/120 (79.17%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 145 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNA 504 +++EE +VQ YRA+LS DVFVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAGE+DNV+ Q+ER V+ELAFPGS+ +V+RLLK Q++SYF +AQPQQ+E GS + SIL A Sbjct: 318 QKQEEEPLEVQRYRAELSEDDVFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFLAFGINAENNQRNFLAGEKDNVVRQIERQVQELAFPGSAQDVERLLKKQRESYFVDAQPQQKEEGSKGRKGPFPSILGA 437
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: GLCA_SOYBN (Beta-conglycinin, alpha chain OS=Glycine max PE=2 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 149.058 bits (375), Expect = 1.118e-35 Identity = 71/121 (58.68%), Postives = 96/121 (79.34%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+S+LN GINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFPGS+ V++LLKNQ++SYF +AQP+++E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 484 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVVVNATSNLNFFAIGINAENNQRNFLAGSQDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPGSAQAVEKLLKNQRESYFVDAQPKKKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 604
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: GLCAP_SOYBN (Beta-conglycinin, alpha' chain OS=Glycine max GN=CG-1 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 148.673 bits (374), Expect = 1.460e-35 Identity = 71/121 (58.68%), Postives = 95/121 (78.51%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+SDLN FGINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFP S+ +++ L+K+Q +SYF +AQPQQ+E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 518 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVMVNATSDLNFFAFGINAENNQRNFLAGSKDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPRSAKDIENLIKSQSESYFVDAQPQQKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 638
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: ALL11_ARAHY (Allergen Ara h 1, clone P17 OS=Arachis hypogaea PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 143.665 bits (361), Expect = 4.696e-34 Identity = 70/131 (53.44%), Postives = 99/131 (75.57%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR----------LSSILNAF 504 E+EE ++++V+ Y A+L GDVF++PA HPVAINASS+L+L+GFGINAENN R FLAG++DNVI Q+E+ K+LAFPGS +V++L+KNQ++S+F +A+PQ + S E E++ L SIL AF Sbjct: 483 EEEEGSNREVRRYTARLKEGDVFIMPAAHPVAINASSELHLLGFGINAENNHRIFLAGDKDNVIDQIEKQAKDLAFPGSGEQVEKLIKNQRESHFVSARPQSQSPSSPEKEDQEEENQGGKGPLLSILKAF 613
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: ALL12_ARAHY (Allergen Ara h 1, clone P41B OS=Arachis hypogaea PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 140.969 bits (354), Expect = 3.044e-33 Identity = 64/111 (57.66%), Postives = 90/111 (81.08%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 172 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETE 504 E+EE ++++V+ Y A+L GDVF++PA HPVAINASS+L+L+GFGINAENN R FLAG++DNVI Q+E+ K+LAFPGS +V++L+KNQK+S+F +A+PQ + S E Sbjct: 488 EEEEGSNREVRRYTARLKEGDVFIMPAAHPVAINASSELHLLGFGINAENNHRIFLAGDKDNVIDQIEKQAKDLAFPGSGEQVEKLIKNQKESHFVSARPQSQSQSPSSPE 598
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT3G22640.1 (| Symbols: PAP85 | cupin family protein | chr3:8011902-8013883 REVERSE LENGTH=486) HSP 1 Score: 75.0998 bits (183), Expect = 2.304e-14 Identity = 40/106 (37.74%), Postives = 62/106 (58.49%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 190 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAI-NASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREI 504 E+EE+ S+ V +++ G+VF++PAGHP I + D +GFGI A N++R FLAGEE N++S + + F S ++L +Q SYFA Q++I Sbjct: 365 EEEEDMSENVHKVVSRVCKGEVFIVPAGHPFTILSQDQDFIAVGFGIYATNSKRTFLAGEE-NLLSNLNPAATRVTFGVGSKVAEKLFTSQNYSYFAPTSRSQQQI 469
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G36700.1 (| Symbols: | RmlC-like cupins superfamily protein | chr4:17298443-17300337 REVERSE LENGTH=522) HSP 1 Score: 55.0694 bits (131), Expect = 2.467e-8 Identity = 33/90 (36.67%), Postives = 52/90 (57.78%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 226 TSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINA--SSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQS 489 TS + + R K+ GD+F +P HP+A + + L +GF +A+NNE FLAG ED+ + ++R V + SS +D LL QK++ Sbjct: 342 TSSECKNVRFKVEEGDIFAVPRLHPMAQMSFNNDSLVFVGFTTSAKNNEPQFLAG-EDSALRMLDRQVLAASLNVSSVTIDGLLGAQKEA 430
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT3G22640.1 (| Symbols: PAP85 | cupin family protein | chr3:8011902-8013883 REVERSE LENGTH=486) HSP 1 Score: 75.0998 bits (183), Expect = 2.304e-14 Identity = 40/106 (37.74%), Postives = 62/106 (58.49%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 190 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAI-NASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREI 504 E+EE+ S+ V +++ G+VF++PAGHP I + D +GFGI A N++R FLAGEE N++S + + F S ++L +Q SYFA Q++I Sbjct: 365 EEEEDMSENVHKVVSRVCKGEVFIVPAGHPFTILSQDQDFIAVGFGIYATNSKRTFLAGEE-NLLSNLNPAATRVTFGVGSKVAEKLFTSQNYSYFAPTSRSQQQI 469
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G36700.1 (| Symbols: | RmlC-like cupins superfamily protein | chr4:17298443-17300337 REVERSE LENGTH=522) HSP 1 Score: 55.0694 bits (131), Expect = 2.467e-8 Identity = 33/90 (36.67%), Postives = 52/90 (57.78%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 226 TSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINA--SSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQS 489 TS + + R K+ GD+F +P HP+A + + L +GF +A+NNE FLAG ED+ + ++R V + SS +D LL QK++ Sbjct: 342 TSSECKNVRFKVEEGDIFAVPRLHPMAQMSFNNDSLVFVGFTTSAKNNEPQFLAG-EDSALRMLDRQVLAASLNVSSVTIDGLLGAQKEA 430
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q702P1_PEA (Vicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 312 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 415
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q702P0_PEA (Vicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 312 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 415
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q43626_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vicK PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VNE1_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VNE0_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 338 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 441
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VND9_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 334 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 437
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VND7_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 205.297 bits (521), Expect = 2.046e-51 Identity = 103/104 (99.04%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: D3VNE2_PEA (Vicilin 47k OS=Pisum sativum GN=vc-2 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 202.601 bits (514), Expect = 1.326e-50 Identity = 100/104 (96.15%), Postives = 103/104 (99.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETSKQVQLY+AKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQV+RPVKELAFPGSSHE+DRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP QRE Sbjct: 335 EQEEETSKQVQLYKAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVQRPVKELAFPGSSHEIDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPLQRE 438
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q41677_VICNA (Vicilin OS=Vicia narbonensis PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 188.734 bits (478), Expect = 1.981e-46 Identity = 93/119 (78.15%), Postives = 109/119 (91.60%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 498 +E T+ QVQ Y+AKLS GDVFVIPAGHPV+I ASS+L+L+GFGINA+NN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGS+ EVDRLL+NQKQS+FANAQPQQRE GS ET + LSSIL+AF Sbjct: 345 DENTNTQVQNYKAKLSRGDVFVIPAGHPVSIKASSNLDLLGFGINAKNNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIDRPVKELAFPGSAQEVDRLLENQKQSHFANAQPQQRERGSHETRDHLSSILDAF 463
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q84UI0_LENCU (Allergen Len c 1.0102 (Fragment) OS=Lens culinaris PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 185.652 bits (470), Expect = 1.677e-45 Identity = 92/104 (88.46%), Postives = 98/104 (94.23%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 193 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQRE 504 EQEEETS QVQ YRAKLSPGDVFV+PAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINA+NN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGSS EVDRLL NQKQS+FANAQP Q E Sbjct: 312 EQEEETSTQVQRYRAKLSPGDVFVVPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAKNNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIQRPVKELAFPGSSREVDRLLTNQKQSHFANAQPLQIE 415
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Lotus protein
Match: chr5.CM0200.910.r2.m (- phase: 0 ) HSP 1 Score: 168.703 bits (426), Expect = 9.226e-43 Identity = 82/121 (67.77%), Postives = 100/121 (82.64%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 E+EE+ + Q +RA+LSPGDV VIPAGHPVAINASSDLN I FGINAENN+R+FLAG +DNVISQ+E+ VKE+AFPGS+ +++RL+KNQ+ S+FANAQPQQRE G LSSIL AF Sbjct: 438 EEEEQPRIEAQRFRARLSPGDVVVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNFIAFGINAENNQRHFLAGGDDNVISQIEKVVKEIAFPGSAEDIERLIKNQRNSHFANAQPQQREEGGHGRRGPLSSILGAF 558
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Lotus protein
Match: chr5.CM0200.930.r2.m (+ phase: 0 ) HSP 1 Score: 162.925 bits (411), Expect = 5.063e-41 Identity = 83/123 (67.48%), Postives = 101/123 (82.11%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSK-QVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQ-REIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 EQEEE + + Q +RA+LSPGDV VIPA HP A+ ASSDLNL+ FGINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ERPVKELAFPGS+ E++ L+KNQ+ S FA+AQPQQ E G S +++LSSIL AF Sbjct: 438 EQEEEQPRIEAQRFRARLSPGDVIVIPASHPFAVTASSDLNLLAFGINAENNQRNFLAGRDDNVISQIERPVKELAFPGSAEEIESLIKNQRNSCFASAQPQQGEEEGRSGKKDQLSSILGAF 560
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Lotus protein
Match: LjSGA_020867.2 (+ phase: 1 /pseudo/partial) HSP 1 Score: 72.7886 bits (177), Expect = 6.890e-14 Identity = 40/112 (35.71%), Postives = 69/112 (61.61%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 178 QEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINAS--SDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQP--QQREIGSSE 501 QE ++S Q A+L PG VFV+PAGHP AS S+L ++ F +NA+NN++ AG + N++S +++ KEL+F + +VD++ + ++ +F + + +E G SE Sbjct: 145 QERKSSPSYQKISARLRPGTVFVVPAGHPFVTIASNKSNLMILRFEVNAKNNKKLTFAG-KGNIVSALDKTAKELSFDYPADKVDKIFERDEEFFFPGPEAFVESKERGHSE 255
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma10g39150.1|PACid:16281484 () HSP 1 Score: 152.14 bits (383), Expect = 2.207e-37 Identity = 72/121 (59.50%), Postives = 96/121 (79.34%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+SDLN FGINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFPGS+ +++ L+K+Q +SYF +AQPQQ+E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 500 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVVVNATSDLNFFAFGINAENNQRNFLAGSKDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPGSAKDIENLIKSQSESYFVDAQPQQKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 620
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma20g28640.1|PACid:16317166 () HSP 1 Score: 150.984 bits (380), Expect = 4.918e-37 Identity = 72/120 (60.00%), Postives = 95/120 (79.17%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 145 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNA 504 +++EE +VQ YRA+LS DVFVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAGE+DNV+ Q+ER V+ELAFPGS+ +V+RLLK Q++SYF +AQPQQ+E GS + SIL A Sbjct: 318 QKQEEEPLEVQRYRAELSEDDVFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFLAFGINAENNQRNFLAGEKDNVVRQIERQVQELAFPGSAQDVERLLKKQRESYFVDAQPQQKEEGSKGRKGPFPSILGA 437
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma20g28460.2|PACid:16317146 () HSP 1 Score: 150.984 bits (380), Expect = 4.918e-37 Identity = 72/120 (60.00%), Postives = 95/120 (79.17%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 145 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNA 504 +++EE +VQ YRA+LS DVFVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAGE+DNV+ Q+ER V+ELAFPGS+ +V+RLLK Q++SYF +AQPQQ+E GS + SIL A Sbjct: 290 QKQEEEPLEVQRYRAELSEDDVFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFLAFGINAENNQRNFLAGEKDNVVRQIERQVQELAFPGSAQDVERLLKKQRESYFVDAQPQQKEEGSKGRKGPFPSILGA 409
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma20g28460.1|PACid:16317145 () HSP 1 Score: 150.984 bits (380), Expect = 4.918e-37 Identity = 72/120 (60.00%), Postives = 95/120 (79.17%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 145 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNA 504 +++EE +VQ YRA+LS DVFVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAGE+DNV+ Q+ER V+ELAFPGS+ +V+RLLK Q++SYF +AQPQQ+E GS + SIL A Sbjct: 318 QKQEEEPLEVQRYRAELSEDDVFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFLAFGINAENNQRNFLAGEKDNVVRQIERQVQELAFPGSAQDVERLLKKQRESYFVDAQPQQKEEGSKGRKGPFPSILGA 437
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma20g28660.1|PACid:16317169 () HSP 1 Score: 149.058 bits (375), Expect = 1.869e-36 Identity = 71/121 (58.68%), Postives = 96/121 (79.34%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+S+LN GINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFPGS+ V++LLKNQ++SYF +AQP+++E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 484 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVVVNATSNLNFFAIGINAENNQRNFLAGSQDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPGSAQAVEKLLKNQRESYFVDAQPKKKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 604
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma20g28650.1|PACid:16317167 () HSP 1 Score: 149.058 bits (375), Expect = 1.869e-36 Identity = 71/121 (58.68%), Postives = 96/121 (79.34%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+S+LN GINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFPGS+ V++LLKNQ++SYF +AQP+++E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 484 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVVVNATSNLNFFAIGINAENNQRNFLAGSQDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPGSAQAVEKLLKNQRESYFVDAQPKKKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 604
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma10g39170.1|PACid:16281486 () HSP 1 Score: 135.961 bits (341), Expect = 1.637e-32 Identity = 62/107 (57.94%), Postives = 89/107 (83.18%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 187 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFP-GSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIG 504 +Q+ E +++V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVI Q+++ VKELAFP GS+ +++ L+KNQ++SYFA+AQP Q+E G Sbjct: 471 QQQGEETREVRKYRAELSEDDIFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFVAFGINAENNQRNFLAGSKDNVIRQIQKQVKELAFPAGSAQDIENLIKNQRESYFADAQPLQKEEG 577
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma20g28650.2|PACid:16317168 () HSP 1 Score: 79.337 bits (194), Expect = 1.818e-15 Identity = 36/58 (62.07%), Postives = 47/58 (81.03%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 331 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAG 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+S+LN GINAENN+RNFLAG Sbjct: 484 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVVVNATSNLNFFAIGINAENNQRNFLAG 541
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma10g39170.2|PACid:16281487 () HSP 1 Score: 78.5666 bits (192), Expect = 3.102e-15 Identity = 34/58 (58.62%), Postives = 48/58 (82.76%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 331 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAG 504 +Q+ E +++V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAG Sbjct: 471 QQQGEETREVRKYRAELSEDDIFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFVAFGINAENNQRNFLAG 528
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Match: Glyma10g03390.1|PACid:16278434 () HSP 1 Score: 57.7658 bits (138), Expect = 5.666e-9 Identity = 34/103 (33.01%), Postives = 57/103 (55.34%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 199 QEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNL--IGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQ 501 + +++S + L PG VFV+P GHP AS+ NL I F +NA +N++ AG +DN++S ++ KELAF S V+ + ++ +F P++ Sbjct: 395 KHDKSSPSYHRISSDLKPGMVFVVPPGHPFVTIASNKENLLMICFEVNARDNKKFTFAG-KDNIVSSLDNVAKELAFNYPSEMVNGVFDRKESFFFPFELPRE 496
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCLA_PEA (Provicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 187.963 bits (476), Expect = 2.211e-47 Identity = 91/121 (75.21%), Postives = 106/121 (87.60%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 ++EEET QVQ Y+AKL+PGDVFVIPAGHPVA+ ASS+LNL+GFGINAENN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ+++ VK+L FPGS+ EVDRLL+NQKQSYFANAQPQQRE S E + L SIL AF Sbjct: 155 QREEETKNQVQSYKAKLTPGDVFVIPAGHPVAVRASSNLNLLGFGINAENNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIQKQVKDLTFPGSAQEVDRLLENQKQSYFANAQPQQRETRSQEIKEHLYSILGAF 275
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCLC_PEA (Vicilin OS=Pisum sativum PE=2 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 186.422 bits (472), Expect = 6.432e-47 Identity = 90/115 (78.26%), Postives = 107/115 (93.04%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 154 EEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSI 498 EEE +KQVQ Y+AKLS GDVFVIPAGHPVA+ ASS+L+L+GFGINAENN+RNFLAG+EDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGS+ EVDR+L+NQKQS+FA+AQPQQRE GS ET +RLSS+ Sbjct: 345 EEEINKQVQNYKAKLSSGDVFVIPAGHPVAVKASSNLDLLGFGINAENNQRNFLAGDEDNVISQIQRPVKELAFPGSAQEVDRILENQKQSHFADAQPQQRERGSRETRDRLSSV 459
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCL_VICFA (Vicilin OS=Vicia faba PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 179.489 bits (454), Expect = 7.862e-45 Identity = 89/119 (74.79%), Postives = 104/119 (87.39%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 498 EEE KQVQ Y+AKLSPGDV VIPAG+PVAI ASS+LNL+GFGINAENN+R FLAGEEDNVISQ+ +PVKELAFPGS+ EVD LL+NQKQS+FANAQP++RE GS E ++ L SIL +F Sbjct: 345 EEEIRKQVQNYKAKLSPGDVLVIPAGYPVAIKASSNLNLVGFGINAENNQRYFLAGEEDNVISQIHKPVKELAFPGSAQEVDTLLENQKQSHFANAQPRERERGSQEIKDHLYSILGSF 463
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: VCLB_PEA (Provicilin (Fragment) OS=Pisum sativum PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 168.318 bits (425), Expect = 1.813e-41 Identity = 84/85 (98.82%), Postives = 84/85 (98.82%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 250 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDR 504 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIG GINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDR Sbjct: 326 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGLGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDR 410
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: CVCA_PEA (Convicilin OS=Pisum sativum GN=CVCA PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 168.318 bits (425), Expect = 1.813e-41 Identity = 79/121 (65.29%), Postives = 103/121 (85.12%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 E +E + +VQ Y A+LSPGDV +IPAGHPVAI+ASS+LNL+GFGINA+NN+RNFL+G +DNVISQ+E PVKEL FPGSS EV+RL+KNQKQS+FA+A+P+Q+E S + LSS+L++F Sbjct: 450 EDRKERNNEVQRYEARLSPGDVVIIPAGHPVAISASSNLNLLGFGINAKNNQRNFLSGSDDNVISQIENPVKELTFPGSSQEVNRLIKNQKQSHFASAEPEQKEEESQRKRSPLSSVLDSF 570
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: GLCB_SOYBN (Beta-conglycinin, beta chain OS=Glycine max GN=CG-4 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 150.984 bits (380), Expect = 2.995e-36 Identity = 72/120 (60.00%), Postives = 95/120 (79.17%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 145 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNA 504 +++EE +VQ YRA+LS DVFVIPA +P +NA+S+LN + FGINAENN+RNFLAGE+DNV+ Q+ER V+ELAFPGS+ +V+RLLK Q++SYF +AQPQQ+E GS + SIL A Sbjct: 318 QKQEEEPLEVQRYRAELSEDDVFVIPAAYPFVVNATSNLNFLAFGINAENNQRNFLAGEKDNVVRQIERQVQELAFPGSAQDVERLLKKQRESYFVDAQPQQKEEGSKGRKGPFPSILGA 437
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: GLCA_SOYBN (Beta-conglycinin, alpha chain OS=Glycine max PE=2 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 149.058 bits (375), Expect = 1.138e-35 Identity = 71/121 (58.68%), Postives = 96/121 (79.34%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+S+LN GINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFPGS+ V++LLKNQ++SYF +AQP+++E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 484 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVVVNATSNLNFFAIGINAENNQRNFLAGSQDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPGSAQAVEKLLKNQRESYFVDAQPKKKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 604
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: GLCAP_SOYBN (Beta-conglycinin, alpha' chain OS=Glycine max GN=CG-1 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 148.673 bits (374), Expect = 1.486e-35 Identity = 71/121 (58.68%), Postives = 95/121 (78.51%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENRLSSILNAF 504 +Q+EE +V+ YRA+LS D+FVIPAG+PV +NA+SDLN FGINAENN+RNFLAG +DNVISQ+ V+ELAFP S+ +++ L+K+Q +SYF +AQPQQ+E G+ + LSSIL AF Sbjct: 518 QQQEEQPLEVRKYRAELSEQDIFVIPAGYPVMVNATSDLNFFAFGINAENNQRNFLAGSKDNVISQIPSQVQELAFPRSAKDIENLIKSQSESYFVDAQPQQKEEGNKGRKGPLSSILRAF 638
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: ALL11_ARAHY (Allergen Ara h 1, clone P17 OS=Arachis hypogaea PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 143.665 bits (361), Expect = 4.781e-34 Identity = 70/131 (53.44%), Postives = 99/131 (75.57%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR----------LSSILNAF 504 E+EE ++++V+ Y A+L GDVF++PA HPVAINASS+L+L+GFGINAENN R FLAG++DNVI Q+E+ K+LAFPGS +V++L+KNQ++S+F +A+PQ + S E E++ L SIL AF Sbjct: 483 EEEEGSNREVRRYTARLKEGDVFIMPAAHPVAINASSELHLLGFGINAENNHRIFLAGDKDNVIDQIEKQAKDLAFPGSGEQVEKLIKNQRESHFVSARPQSQSPSSPEKEDQEEENQGGKGPLLSILKAF 613
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Match: ALL12_ARAHY (Allergen Ara h 1, clone P41B OS=Arachis hypogaea PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 140.969 bits (354), Expect = 3.099e-33 Identity = 64/111 (57.66%), Postives = 90/111 (81.08%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 172 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETE 504 E+EE ++++V+ Y A+L GDVF++PA HPVAINASS+L+L+GFGINAENN R FLAG++DNVI Q+E+ K+LAFPGS +V++L+KNQK+S+F +A+PQ + S E Sbjct: 488 EEEEGSNREVRRYTARLKEGDVFIMPAAHPVAINASSELHLLGFGINAENNHRIFLAGDKDNVIDQIEKQAKDLAFPGSGEQVEKLIKNQKESHFVSARPQSQSQSPSSPE 598
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Match: IMGA|Medtr7g079770.1 (Provicilin (Fragment) (AHRD V1 ***- P02854); contains Interpro domain(s) IPR014710 RmlC-like jelly roll fold chr07_pseudomolecule_IMGAG_V3.5 22543536-22546354 F EGN_Mt100125 20100825) HSP 1 Score: 182.185 bits (461), Expect = 1.172e-46 Identity = 92/124 (74.19%), Postives = 108/124 (87.10%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQ--REIGSSETENRL-SSILNAF 504 +QEEE S+QVQ YRA+LSPGDV+VIPAGHP ++ASSDL+L+GFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQ+ERPVKE+AFPGS+ +V+ LLKNQ+QSYFANAQPQQ RE G S+ + L SSIL F Sbjct: 340 QQEEERSQQVQRYRARLSPGDVYVIPAGHPTVVSASSDLSLLGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQIERPVKEVAFPGSAQDVESLLKNQRQSYFANAQPQQREREEGRSQRQRELISSILGVF 463
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Match: IMGA|Medtr7g079820.1 (Convicilin (Fragment) (AHRD V1 ***- B0BCL8_VICFA); contains Interpro domain(s) IPR014710 RmlC-like jelly roll fold chr07_pseudomolecule_IMGAG_V3.5 22559589-22562019 F EGN_Mt100125 20100825) HSP 1 Score: 181.8 bits (460), Expect = 1.530e-46 Identity = 88/124 (70.97%), Postives = 108/124 (87.10%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR---LSSILNAF 504 EQ++E S+QVQ YRA+LSPGDV+VIPAGHP+ + ASSDL+L+GFGINAENN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ+ERPVKE+AFPGS+ +V+ LLKNQ+QSYFANAQPQQRE ++ + +SSIL AF Sbjct: 348 EQQQERSQQVQRYRARLSPGDVYVIPAGHPIVVKASSDLSLLGFGINAENNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIERPVKEVAFPGSAQDVESLLKNQRQSYFANAQPQQREREEGRSQRQREPISSILGAF 471
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Match: IMGA|Medtr7g079730.1 (Convicilin (Fragment) (AHRD V1 ***- B0BCJ4_PEA); contains Interpro domain(s) IPR014710 RmlC-like jelly roll fold chr07_pseudomolecule_IMGAG_V3.5 22531082-22533478 F EGN_Mt100125 20100825) HSP 1 Score: 181.8 bits (460), Expect = 1.530e-46 Identity = 88/124 (70.97%), Postives = 108/124 (87.10%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR---LSSILNAF 504 EQ++E S+QVQ YRA+LSPGDV+VIPAGHP+ + ASSDL+L+GFGINAENN+RNFLAGEEDNVISQ+ERPVKE+AFPGS+ +V+ LLKNQ+QSYFANAQPQQRE ++ + +SSIL AF Sbjct: 341 EQQQERSQQVQRYRARLSPGDVYVIPAGHPIVVTASSDLSLLGFGINAENNQRNFLAGEEDNVISQIERPVKEVAFPGSAQDVESLLKNQRQSYFANAQPQQREREEGRSQRQREPISSILGAF 464
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Match: IMGA|Medtr7g079780.1 (Convicilin (Fragment) (AHRD V1 ***- B0BCL6_VICNA); contains Interpro domain(s) IPR014710 RmlC-like jelly roll fold chr07_pseudomolecule_IMGAG_V3.5 22548736-22551151 F EGN_Mt100125 20100825) HSP 1 Score: 176.407 bits (446), Expect = 6.430e-45 Identity = 87/124 (70.16%), Postives = 107/124 (86.29%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR---LSSILNAF 504 EQEEE S+QVQ YRA+L+PGDV+VIPAG+P + ASSDL+L+GFGINAENN+R+FLAGEEDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGS+ +V+ LLKNQ+QSYFANAQPQQRE ++ + +SSIL AF Sbjct: 341 EQEEERSQQVQRYRARLTPGDVYVIPAGYPNVVKASSDLSLLGFGINAENNQRSFLAGEEDNVISQIQRPVKELAFPGSAQDVESLLKNQRQSYFANAQPQQREREEGRSQRQREPISSILGAF 464
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Match: IMGA|Medtr7g079740.1 (Convicilin (Fragment) (AHRD V1 ***- B0BCL4_9FABA); contains Interpro domain(s) IPR014710 RmlC-like jelly roll fold chr07_pseudomolecule_IMGAG_V3.5 22536046-22538501 F EGN_Mt100125 20100825) HSP 1 Score: 172.94 bits (437), Expect = 7.109e-44 Identity = 85/124 (68.55%), Postives = 105/124 (84.68%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 142 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINASSDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR---LSSILNAF 504 EQEEE S+QVQ YRA+L+PGDV+VIPAG+P + ASSDL+L+GFGINAENN+R+FLAGEEDNVISQ++RPVKELAFPGS+ +V+ LLKNQ+QSYFANAQPQQRE ++ + +SSI F Sbjct: 350 EQEEERSQQVQRYRARLTPGDVYVIPAGYPNVVKASSDLSLLGFGINAENNQRSFLAGEEDNVISQIQRPVKELAFPGSAQDVESLLKNQRQSYFANAQPQQREREEGRSQRKREPISSISGTF 473
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Match: IMGA|Medtr1g071710.1 (Vicilin-like antimicrobial peptides 2-2 (AHRD V1 **-- Q9SPL4); contains Interpro domain(s) IPR014710 RmlC-like jelly roll fold chr01_pseudomolecule_IMGAG_V3.5 17782591-17780098 F EGN_Mt100125 20100825) HSP 1 Score: 70.8626 bits (172), Expect = 3.804e-13 Identity = 40/115 (34.78%), Postives = 66/115 (57.39%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 166 EQEEETSKQVQLYRAKLSPGDVFVIPAGHPVAINAS--SDLNLIGFGINAENNERNFLAGEEDNVISQVERPVKELAFPGSSHEVDRLLKNQKQSYFANAQPQQREIGSSETENR 504 +Q +S Q A+L PG VFV+PAGHP AS ++L ++ F +NA+ N++ AG ++N++S +++ K+LAF S+ +VD + K ++ +F P E S E R Sbjct: 382 KQRRSSSTSYQKINARLRPGTVFVVPAGHPFVTIASKNNNLKIVCFEVNAQRNKKLAFAG-KNNIVSALDKTAKKLAFDKSAEKVDEIFKRDEEFFF----PYDVEDESKEEHGR 491 The following BLAST results are available for this feature:
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2010-12-28 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v1 vs Trembl) Total hits: 10
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2010-12-28 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v1 vs Swissprot) Total hits: 10
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TAIR peptide
Analysis Date: 2011-02-03 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v1 vs TAIR 10 peptide) Total hits: 2
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TAIR peptide
Analysis Date: 2011-04-21 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v2 vs TAIR 10 peptide) Total hits: 2
BLAST of CD859582 vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2011-04-27 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v2 vs Trembl) Total hits: 10
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Lotus protein
Analysis Date: 2011-04-21 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v2 vs Lotus proteins) Total hits: 3
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Soybean peptides
Analysis Date: 2011-04-21 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v2 vs Soybean peptides) Total hits: 10
BLAST of CD859582 vs. SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2011-04-21 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v2 vs Swissprot) Total hits: 10
BLAST of CD859582 vs. Medicago proteins
Analysis Date: 2011-04-21 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v2 vs Medicago proteins) Total hits: 6
InterPro
Analysis Name: InterProScan analysis for Pisum sativum unigene v2
Date Performed: 2011-04-27
Analysis Name: InterProScan analysis for Pisum sativum unigene v1 Date Performed: 2010-12-29
Properties
Sequences
The
following sequences are available for this feature:
EST sequence >CD859582 ID=CD859582; Name=CD859582; organism=Pisum sativum; type=EST; length=505bpback to top |