Publication Overview
TitleGBS-Based Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought
AuthorsAnnicchiarico P, Nazzicari N, Pecetti L, Romani M, Ferrari B, Wei Y, Brummer EB
TypeJournal Article
Year2017
CitationAnnicchiarico P, Nazzicari N, Pecetti L, Romani M, Ferrari B, Wei Y, Brummer EB. GBS-Based Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought. 2017.

Abstract

erminal drought is the main stress that limits pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yield in Mediterranean-climate regions. This study provides an unprecedented assessment of the predictive ability of genomic selection (GS) for grain yield under severe terminal drought using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data. Additional aims were to assess the GS predictive ability for different GBS data quality filters and GS models, comparing intrapopulation with interpopulation GS predictive ability and to perform genome-wide association (GWAS) studies. The yield and onset of flowering of 315 lines from three recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations issued by connected crosses between three elite cultivars were assessed under a field rainout shelter. We defined an adjusted yield, which is associated with intrinsic drought tolerance, as the yield deviation from the value expected as a function of onset of flowering (which correlated negatively with grain yield). Total polymorphic markers ranged from approximately 100 (minimum of eight reads per locus, maximum 10% genotype missing data) to over 7500 markers (minimum of four reads, maximum 50% missing rate). Best predictions were provided by Bayesian Lasso (BL) or ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (rrBLUP), rather than support vector regression (SVR) models, with at least 400–500 markers. Intrapopulation GS predictive ability exceeded 0.5 for yield and onset of flowering in all populations and approached 0.4 for the adjusted yield of a population with high trait variation. Genomic selection was preferable to phenotypic selection in terms of predicted yield gains. Interpopulation GS predictive ability varied largely depending on the pair of populations. GWAS revealed extensive colocalization of markers associated with high yield and early flowering and suggested that they are concentrated in a few genomic regions.
Features
This publication contains information about 80 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
TP63778TP63778genetic_marker
TP6407TP6407genetic_marker
TP65092TP65092genetic_marker
TP65456TP65456genetic_marker
TP65617TP65617genetic_marker
TP66366TP66366genetic_marker
TP66808TP66808genetic_marker
TP67424TP67424genetic_marker
TP68525TP68525genetic_marker
TP6885TP6885genetic_marker
TP68886TP68886genetic_marker
TP7263TP7263genetic_marker
TP72653TP72653genetic_marker
TP75090TP75090genetic_marker
TP75695TP75695genetic_marker
TP76294TP76294genetic_marker
TP78343TP78343genetic_marker
TP80798TP80798genetic_marker
TP8093TP8093genetic_marker
TP8186TP8186genetic_marker
TP83230TP83230genetic_marker
TP84217TP84217genetic_marker
TP85968TP85968genetic_marker
TP86076TP86076genetic_marker
TP92803TP92803genetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 6 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
AttikaAttikaaccession
IsardIsardaccession
KaspaKaspaaccession
Attika_x_IsardAttika_x_Isardpopulation
Kaspa_x_AttikaKaspa_x_Attikapopulation
Kaspa_x_IsardKaspa_x_Isardpopulation
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
DOIdoi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0072
URLhttps://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/tpg/articles/0/0/plantgenome2016.07.0072