Publication Overview
TitleGBS-Based Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought
AuthorsAnnicchiarico P, Nazzicari N, Pecetti L, Romani M, Ferrari B, Wei Y, Brummer EB
TypeJournal Article
Year2017
CitationAnnicchiarico P, Nazzicari N, Pecetti L, Romani M, Ferrari B, Wei Y, Brummer EB. GBS-Based Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought. 2017.

Abstract

erminal drought is the main stress that limits pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yield in Mediterranean-climate regions. This study provides an unprecedented assessment of the predictive ability of genomic selection (GS) for grain yield under severe terminal drought using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data. Additional aims were to assess the GS predictive ability for different GBS data quality filters and GS models, comparing intrapopulation with interpopulation GS predictive ability and to perform genome-wide association (GWAS) studies. The yield and onset of flowering of 315 lines from three recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations issued by connected crosses between three elite cultivars were assessed under a field rainout shelter. We defined an adjusted yield, which is associated with intrinsic drought tolerance, as the yield deviation from the value expected as a function of onset of flowering (which correlated negatively with grain yield). Total polymorphic markers ranged from approximately 100 (minimum of eight reads per locus, maximum 10% genotype missing data) to over 7500 markers (minimum of four reads, maximum 50% missing rate). Best predictions were provided by Bayesian Lasso (BL) or ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (rrBLUP), rather than support vector regression (SVR) models, with at least 400–500 markers. Intrapopulation GS predictive ability exceeded 0.5 for yield and onset of flowering in all populations and approached 0.4 for the adjusted yield of a population with high trait variation. Genomic selection was preferable to phenotypic selection in terms of predicted yield gains. Interpopulation GS predictive ability varied largely depending on the pair of populations. GWAS revealed extensive colocalization of markers associated with high yield and early flowering and suggested that they are concentrated in a few genomic regions.
Features
This publication contains information about 80 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
TP100946TP100946genetic_marker
TP104528TP104528genetic_marker
TP106377TP106377genetic_marker
TP107553TP107553genetic_marker
TP11829TP11829genetic_marker
TP12290TP12290genetic_marker
TP12496TP12496genetic_marker
TP13371TP13371genetic_marker
TP13485TP13485genetic_marker
TP15681TP15681genetic_marker
TP16019TP16019genetic_marker
TP16696TP16696genetic_marker
TP18452TP18452genetic_marker
TP20186TP20186genetic_marker
TP21941TP21941genetic_marker
TP22712TP22712genetic_marker
TP2304TP2304genetic_marker
TP33380TP33380genetic_marker
TP33893TP33893genetic_marker
TP34848TP34848genetic_marker
TP36756TP36756genetic_marker
TP37TP37genetic_marker
TP37376TP37376genetic_marker
TP39576TP39576genetic_marker
TP43237TP43237genetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 6 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
AttikaAttikaaccession
IsardIsardaccession
KaspaKaspaaccession
Attika_x_IsardAttika_x_Isardpopulation
Kaspa_x_AttikaKaspa_x_Attikapopulation
Kaspa_x_IsardKaspa_x_Isardpopulation
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
DOIdoi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0072
URLhttps://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/tpg/articles/0/0/plantgenome2016.07.0072